Specialist Arms Forum

Battlefleet Gothic => [BFG] Discussion => Topic started by: afterimagedan on March 27, 2013, 07:19:40 PM

Title: BFG:R Vote 58: Jovian
Post by: afterimagedan on March 27, 2013, 07:19:40 PM

Please vote!

Title: Re: BFG:R Vote 58: Jovian
Post by: Jimmy Zimms on March 27, 2013, 07:39:31 PM

I assume this is stats\base-cost and not inclusion in any specific fleet a.k.a. The fleet that shall not be named  :D

Title: Re: BFG:R Vote 58: Jovian
Post by: afterimagedan on March 27, 2013, 07:45:45 PM

This is a vote for just as it is in 2010; you are correct good sir.

Title: Re: BFG:R Vote 58: Jovian
Post by: afterimagedan on March 28, 2013, 10:50:28 PM

How many people would favor moving the Jovian to the Gothic sector list?

Title: Re: BFG:R Vote 58: Jovian
Post by: Dragon Lord on March 28, 2013, 11:54:00 PM

I would definitely favour moving the Jovian elsewhere, it doesn't seem appropriate for a fleet list that is supposed to lack carriers.

Title: Re: BFG:R Vote 58: Jovian
Post by: AndrewChristlieb on March 29, 2013, 12:29:51 AM

I obviously think moving the Jovain is the best option and in the Gothic sector list it wouldnt really skew anything badly at all.

That still doesnt address the issue of the Dominion or Enforcer tho. I actually really like the idea Horizon/Sig suggested of a Gareox era Bakka list to place all of our misguided carrier designs. This would allow the "modern"? Bakka to remain carrier free and allow the carriers to be available as reserves as they currently are.

Title: Re: BFG:R Vote 58: Jovian
Post by: afterimagedan on March 29, 2013, 12:56:24 AM

Deal. But then what will the committee do?

Title: Re: BFG:R Vote 58: Jovian
Post by: AndrewChristlieb on March 29, 2013, 01:22:58 AM

Presumably assemble workable lists instead of a collection of ideas and coulda beens.

Title: Re: BFG:R Vote 58: Jovian
Post by: afterimagedan on March 29, 2013, 02:05:49 AM

My assumption is that both sides like this idea. Why not work on it here like the chaos lists?

Title: Re: BFG:R Vote 58: Jovian
Post by: AndrewChristlieb on March 29, 2013, 02:30:02 AM

Well really just to try and keep the air clear a bit, I'll throw up something in the experimental section tho so we can get something in motion if you like.

Title: Re: BFG:R Vote 58: Jovian
Post by: Tyberius on March 29, 2013, 02:39:58 AM

I also, agree to move the jovian to the gothic sector as an unique vessel (0-1) or to include it on a AC heavy Corribra sector fleet list, (which includes the nemesis fleet carrier and other interesting ships)

Title: Re: BFG:R Vote 58: Jovian
Post by: afterimagedan on March 29, 2013, 02:50:18 AM

If I remember correctly, the Jovian was part of the Gothic sector, and there were 4 of them made.

Title: Re: BFG:R Vote 58: Jovian
Post by: Tyberius on March 29, 2013, 02:57:22 AM

Quote from: afterimagedan on March 29, 2013, 02:50:18 AM

If I remember correctly, the Jovian was part of the Gothic sector, and there were 4 of them made.

I'm not sure about that, let me read it again...

Title: Re: BFG:R Vote 58: Jovian
Post by: AndrewChristlieb on March 29, 2013, 03:00:37 AM

Plans for 3, leaves it open but can easily be blocked. Ive said this before but I dont think that allowing the Jovian to be taken by any list as a reserve will in anyway break the IN. The problem is fitting it into a list that it can be freely taken without steping on any other ships toes (Mars and Dominion mainly). Thats what I like about the Gareox list idea, or Corribra if that names perfered.

Title: Re: BFG:R Vote 58: Jovian
Post by: afterimagedan on March 29, 2013, 03:05:28 AM

Sounds like a plan, Andrew. Let's keep it to the Gareox list and the Gothic sector list would be able to take it as a reserve ship.

Title: Re: BFG:R Vote 58: Jovian
Post by: Free the Baron on March 30, 2013, 10:40:34 PM

I call every one to vote against the Jovian rules! Its fine right where it is.