Specialist Arms Forum
Battlefleet Gothic => [BFG] Discussion => Topic started by: afterimagedan on May 24, 2013, 05:43:59 AM
-
Pending possible name changes and discussion, should we consider the Tyranid document finalized?
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1596994/BFGR%202/BFGR%20Tyranid%20Hive%20Fleets.pdf (https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1596994/BFGR%202/BFGR%20Tyranid%20Hive%20Fleets.pdf)
-
The only discussion maybe neccessary would be the ordinance one. Nids are still likely to have lower LB capacity than alot of fleets AND have slower ordinance, so their turn around is alot less. BUT if I am the only one that feels this way, nevermind then.
I still voted yes. All the other changes are great and it is in a playable state. I think the hiveship names are all great, but some of the smaller ships have akward naming conventions to me (Kraken Carnivore and then Predator Kraken- why is kraken 1st in one and second in another)
Other brief editing issues (pg 1 is cover pg for ref)
PG 2
paragraph break missing between intro and "THE INTERGALATIC PREDATOR". Every other segment has the break.
PG 3- 3rd column "Fell into 2 main categories" and then the categories aren't mentioned. Maybe say "2 main categories: hive ships and drones.
-
In my regular 1500 fleet, I have 12 launch capacity. And that's a pre-bfgr fleet. Also, don't forget their double launch capacity. That's a vital difference.
-
In my regular 1500 fleet, I have 12 launch capacity. And that's a pre-bfgr fleet. Also, don't forget their double launch capacity. That's a vital difference.
I had forgotten that. It is fine then.