May 24, 2025, 07:16:26 PM

Author Topic: Defended Steamtanks !  (Read 9877 times)

Offline Lex

  • Global Moderator
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1451
  • I wonder...
    • Loc: Bergen op Zoom, Netherlands
    • Warmuster . BitzBox
Re: Defended Steamtanks !
« Reply #30 on: November 23, 2012, 09:54:29 PM »
. But I can understand the other interpretation. Is no one in contact with the person who drafted the revised steam tank rules?

Raises finger...    :-[   :-X   :'(

Offline honestmistake

  • Active Member
  • *
  • Posts: 131
  • Tentacles make everything better!
Re: Defended Steamtanks !
« Reply #31 on: November 24, 2012, 12:56:53 AM »
Oh dear, poor Lex clearly doesn't watch enough war films.... never volunteer, always take a step back. Looks like you get to poke the person who wrote the rule and make him/her/it explain what they meant  :o

Offline StumpyCat

  • Lurker
  • *
  • Posts: 5
    • Loc: Behind you
Re: Defended Steamtanks !
« Reply #32 on: November 24, 2012, 03:28:51 AM »
I am sorry but I lose the power of reasoned argument.
I have these "discusions" every thursday with MrMistake and I now cannot really be botherd.
What ever rules you wish to implement or make up are yours for the offing.
I shal not contest or offer any argument to your constant shouting.
Your last move took one hundered and seventeen minutes at that time I had lost the will to live.
Let alone point out or contest your rules arguments.

Offline Lex

  • Global Moderator
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1451
  • I wonder...
    • Loc: Bergen op Zoom, Netherlands
    • Warmuster . BitzBox
Re: Defended Steamtanks !
« Reply #33 on: November 24, 2012, 07:48:08 AM »
Oh dear, poor Lex clearly doesn't watch enough war films.... never volunteer, always take a step back. Looks like you get to poke the person who wrote the rule and make him/her/it explain what they meant  :o

Not volunteering...   8)

I am/was part of the review.....   hence my earlier point on generic vs special rules. But I stand corrected by Guthwine: both the rules for Steamtank AND cannon are in effect special rules and thus both apply. Mind you the review on this bit was some time ago...



One note on the rulebook, and a point of some contention when doing the review, is that the writing-style of the book tends to "merge" fluff in with rules, which often leads to potential misinterpretation. We did discuss cleaning up those areas with Rick at the time, but sadly with the restructuring of GW and his subsequent departure, never got around to take out those ambivalent paragraphs.



The best I can offer right now would be to dedicate part of the forum to "answer" these questions, but the simple fact is that time and again we get told that "it aint official if GW dont print it", so the best we can manage here is to have a "community rule" (as a houserule, but for a larger meta-environment)

Offline honestmistake

  • Active Member
  • *
  • Posts: 131
  • Tentacles make everything better!
Re: Defended Steamtanks !
« Reply #34 on: November 24, 2012, 04:50:11 PM »
I shal not contest or offer any argument to your constant shouting.
Your last move took one hundered and seventeen minutes at that time I had lost the will to live.
Let alone point out or contest your rules arguments.

I don't recal constant shouting but all of us were certainly loud and I am definately the biggest offender :-[
 As for a 117 minute turn... that seems a lot longer than i recal but it did involve 7 or 8 distinct multi unit combats featuring almost every unit on the table and shooting by the rest so yes, it was a bloody long turn  :o

Oddly, it did not involve any discussion of the steamtank as it failed to move, only shot once and was never targeted ::)