May 25, 2025, 09:03:28 PM

Author Topic: Magic Items Question  (Read 5264 times)

Offline pw

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 447
Re: Magic Items Question
« Reply #15 on: August 30, 2012, 09:01:19 AM »
Just in case weight of numbers has any influence on your discussion, I completely agree with the interpretations above. To my mind, a spell can only be dispelled if it is successful in the first place (being cast successfully is not the same thing as having things actually happen to the enemy). In other words, the success of casting the spell is the wizards job, having a game effect is the spell's job. The dispeller gets in the middle of this process but doesn't effect the intial casting.

Offline Lex

  • Global Moderator
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1451
  • I wonder...
    • Loc: Bergen op Zoom, Netherlands
    • Warmuster . BitzBox
Re: Magic Items Question
« Reply #16 on: September 04, 2012, 10:04:06 PM »
Back from hollidays....  so the final word on this.

There is GAME mechanics and FLUFF text. The argument used against you is a FLUFF text interpretation. Check the FULL quote

Quote
page 77 ORB
If a wizard od a dwarf runesmith has a scroll of dispelling he can automatically cause the enemy´s spell to fail (which is what Chris uses, however the next sentence reads) The Scroll can ONLY (emphasis mine) be used once to nullify the effect of a spell an enemy Wizard has successfully cast....

the sentence ...cause the enemy´s spell to fail... is a FLUFF way to describe the actual mechanism of ...nullifying the effect... of a spell ... successfully cast...

Chris, Rick and other are aware that there are several more places in the rules where this kind of interpretation is possible because of the unclear delineation between fluff and rule, but I think this one is clear enough !

8)