Do you think it's worth trying to do our own version of army lists?
Overall i think warmaster is very close to having balanced armies, but the reason i ask is i still read posts that say ...."i've never won a game with my orc army" or ...."I don't use the high elf list from the core rules because they're too powerfull"
If we do this, we could present it as optional. I play quite a few boardgames with a group of friends, he goes on a site that has ideas for balancing the game. The articles are presented with titles such as "if you are finding that X wins all the time, then try this minor tweak"
I know Blood Bowl has it's own living rulebook, i was thinking the same with Warmaster.
What do you think?
EDIT... it also gives us a chance to include rules for extra units that don't have rules if we think it's worth it. For example greatswords for Empire, swordmasters for High Elves. I like the abstract nature of warmaster, and don't want it bogged down with lots of special rules, so unsure about new rules for units. Just an idea.
PS. obviously there's a few army lists i wouldn't be able to comment on, because i've never used them or battled against them (eg. Ogre kingdoms, lizardmen, skaven)
